Here's a copy of a note I sent out to our entire staff on Friday morning. Thought it might make interesting reading for folks who are interested in what we do down here at the newspaper. Ben
From: Holden, Ben - Columbus
Sent: Friday, March 27, 2009 10:10 AM
To: CLE - Broadcast
Subject: Teamwork
Now and then I like to joke that some folks think gremlins put out the paper. Most of us work during the daylight hours and when we leave for home much of what shows up as news in the morning paper has not been reported, edited or designed on pages. Such was the case yesterday with Alan's fine work on our new district attorney, who has decided not to seek the death penalty against Charles Johnston, the man who shot and killed three people last year at Doctors Hospital.
Alan interviewed D.A. Slater once earlier in the day for a story that was to be a sidebar to our package on Cpl. Mike Dahnke, the officer who shot Johnston. But when we realized Slater was making bigger news with the death penalty decision, we sent him back out for a more in-depth probe of the issue.
He got back to the office around 5:30 p.m., and belted out a new lead and a completely re-done story by 7:30 last night. Elizabeth Conner, our Night Editor, then did a fine job of editing and sharpening the piece, taking it from a relatively inconsequential sidebar to our A1 lead.
Holly Leach, our A1 designer, worked quickly to produce the main substance of the Page One design and layout that you see today, shooting off PDF copies for review shortly after 10:30 p.m. (Meanwhile, Elizabeth is contacting Alan to double-check the story edits for accuracy). Tim Chitwood's thoughtful re-telling of Cpl. Dahnke's heroism was the perfect complement to Alan's fine reporting).
The bottom line, from my perspective, is that anyone who loves newspapers and who is invested in this industry should take heart; with the pride and dedication that I saw last night, we are not only still alive, but we will continue to thrive.
Regards, Ben
-v-
Ben Holden
Vice President & Executive Editor
Ledger-Enquirer
(706) 571-8560 - Phone
(706) 576-6290 - Fax
www.ledger-enquirer.com
bholden@ledger-enquirer.com
Friday, March 27, 2009
Friday, November 21, 2008
Bias or Bluster?
Your read of the following exchange between Executive Editor Ben Holden and Republican Party Chair Josh McKoon may vary depending upon your perspective. The following four documents, all of which follow below, are relevant:
1. A proposed Op-Ed piece written by McKoon.
2. A Letter reply from Holden to McKoon, with attachments, taking issue with factual assertions in the McKoon piece.
3. The final re-submitted piece, submitted by McKoon for publication on Sunday Nov. 23 in the Voices section of the Ledger-Enquirer.
1) The Ledger-Enquirer. The Friday editorial admonished voters to watch Republicans for signs of being uncooperative with Obama and the Democratic majorities in Congress. I don't remember any such editorial asking Tom Daschle or Nancy Pelosi to play nice with President Bush when he was elected, twice. It seems counterintuitive to suggest that the party to watch now is the GOP when Democrats control the Legislative and Executive Branches of government. How about cautioning overreach by those in control? Remember 1993 when after running on economic policy President Clinton swung into action by having legislation introduced to...allow gays in the military?!
The Sunday editorial seems to suggest that the concerns about the fairness of coverage in the newspaper are totally without merit. (Deleted following discussions between McKoon and Holden) I have to take strong exception to that notion. The Ledger-Enquirer is the newspaper of record in our community.
I know when I research events and am looking for factual information, I go to archives of the Ledger. I also look to be able to cite the Ledger in debates again for a factual source on which we all can agree. Unfortunately, the Ledger and other mainstream media organs are losing this reputation of being an objective source of information.
This goes beyond an endorsement of Obama for President, although I urge a comparison of that editorial with the endorsement of Bush in 2004 and it seems hard to understand how both opinions can be held by the same editorial board.
The news items carried by the Ledger, principally coming from the Associated Press, have been very much stacked in favor of the Obama campaign.
You want some examples I am sure, so let me provide you some. The Ledger ran stories about Palin's unreadiness as VP, the amount spent on her wardrobe for the campaign and the so-called "Troopergate" episode.
The Ledger did not run any stories questioning Biden's readiness (i.e. his > suggestion in the wake of 9/11 that we should write Iran a check for $200 million), his connections with the credit card issuer MBNA (an MBNA executive bought Biden's house, etc.) or how many $1,000+ suits Biden had bought for him by the DNC or Obama-Biden.
The Ledger failed to run a single story on how the Obama campaign disabled basic credit card security software that allowed donations from multiple names using the same credit card number (Osama bin Laden and Adolph Hitler being a couple of names that got through), that did not check for overseas donations > or in any way come into compliance with FEC rules. Where were the Ledger stories following Stanley Kurtz lead on the connections between Obama and William Ayers or Obama and Tony Rezko?
Of course we did see stories about McCain and the Keating 5 and the many "lobbyists" working in McCain's campaign. I could go on and on but the fact is the Ledger's coverage mirrored that of many other media outlets in its tilt toward Obama.
There has always been a liberal bias in the press, but at the end of the day the press has followed stories where they lead no matter who was involved (witness Gary Hart and Donna Rice, Bill Clinton and the many scandals of his administration).
The 2008 campaign will be remembered as the time when liberal media bias transformed into liberal media advocacy, summed up recently by Chris Mathews who said his job as a journalist is to make Barack Obama successful.
This is why readership, advertising and subscriptions will continue to decline as long as the Ledger is seen less and less an honest broker of the news with a left leaning editorial bent and instead as a Pravda-like propaganda arm of the Obama campaign from the news and editorial pages. I hope you might take some of this criticism into account as you seek to cover the Obama inauguration and his administration.
Josh McKoon Chairman, Muscogee County Republican Party
2)
Date: Nov. 18, 2008
3) Final Version of McKoon Op-Ed From: Joshua McKoon Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 Dear Editor: I read with great interest the editorial in the Friday edition of the Ledger-Enquirer. The Friday editorial admonished voters to watch Republicans for signs of being uncooperative with Obama and the Democratic majorities in Congress. I don't remember any such editorial asking Tom Daschle or Nancy Pelosi to play nice with President Bush when he was elected, twice. It seems counterintuitive to suggest that the party to watch now is the GOP when Democrats control the Legislative and Executive Branches of government. How about cautioning overreach by those in control? Remember 1993 when after running on economic policy President Clinton swung into action by having legislation introduced to...allow gays in the military?! I wanted to address the issue of fairness in terms of the news coverage toward the two presidential tickets. The Ledger-Enquirer is the newspaper of record in our community. I know when I research events and am looking for factual information, I go to archives of the Ledger. I also look to cite the Ledger in debates again for a factual source on which we all can agree. Unfortunately, the Ledger and other mainstream media organs are losing this reputation of being an objective source of information.
The news items carried by the Ledger, principally coming from the Associated Press, have appeared to me to be stacked in favor of the Obama campaign. You want some examples I am sure, so let me provide you with a few.
The Ledger ran stories about Palin's alleged unreadiness as VP, the amount spent on her wardrobe for the campaign and the so-called "Troopergate" episode. The Ledger did not run any stories questioning Biden's readiness (i.e. his suggestion in the wake of 9/11 that we should write Iran a check for $200 million), his connections with the credit card issuer MBNA (an MBNA executive bought Biden's house, etc.) or how many $1,000+ suits Biden had bought for him by the DNC or Obama-Biden.
The Ledger failed to run a single story on how the Obama campaign disabled basic credit card security software that allowed donations from multiple names using the same credit card number (Osama bin Laden and Adolf Hitler being a couple of names that got through), that did not check for overseas donations or in any way come into compliance with FEC rules.
Where were the Ledger stories following Stanley Kurtz lead on the connections between Obama and William Ayers or Obama and Tony Rezko? Of course we did see stories about McCain and the Keating 5 and the many "lobbyists" working in McCain's campaign. I could go on but the fact is the Ledger's coverage mirrored that of many other media outlets relying on wire services in its tilt toward Obama.
There has always been a liberal bias in the press, but at the end of the day the press has followed stories where they led no matter who was involved (witness Gary Hart and Donna Rice, Bill Clinton and the many scandals of his administration).
The 2008 campaign will be remembered as the time when liberal media bias transformed into liberal media advocacy, summed up recently by Chris Mathews who said his job as a journalist is to make Barack Obama successful.
I hope you might take some of this criticism into account as you seek to cover the Obama inauguration and his administration. While I have this platform, I do want to make one other thing clear.
While I opposed the election of the Obama-Biden ticket with all the effort I could muster, we must all now respect the decision the American people have made.
In the wake of this election, evidently there are people making statements that Obama is the anti-Christ or Obama is a radical Muslim "Manchurian Candidate" of some kind. These statements are not only patently false and hateful but also do immeasurable damage to those of us who are trying to articulate a reasoned opposition to the policies we expect will be proposed in the next administration.
We need to stand together in condemning those irresponsible statements and focus on moving our country forward. As for me, Barack Obama is my President and I will support him when I can and respectfully disagree when I cannot. Thank you for the chance to say that. Regards, Josh McKoon, Chairman, Muscogee County Republican Party
1. A proposed Op-Ed piece written by McKoon.
2. A Letter reply from Holden to McKoon, with attachments, taking issue with factual assertions in the McKoon piece.
3. The final re-submitted piece, submitted by McKoon for publication on Sunday Nov. 23 in the Voices section of the Ledger-Enquirer.
1) T
The Sunday editorial seems to suggest that the concerns about the fairness of coverage in the newspaper are totally without merit. (Deleted following discussions between McKoon and Holden) I have to take strong exception to that notion. The Ledger-Enquirer is the newspaper of record in our community.
I know when I research events and am looking for factual information, I go to archives of the Ledger. I also look to be able to cite the Ledger in debates again for a factual source on which we all can agree. Unfortunately, the Ledger and other mainstream media organs are losing this reputation of being an objective source of information.
This goes beyond an endorsement of Obama for President, although I urge a comparison of that editorial with the endorsement of Bush in 2004 and it seems hard to understand how both opinions can be held by the same editorial board.
The news items carried by the Ledger, principally coming from the Associated Press, have been very much stacked in favor of the Obama campaign.
You want some examples I am sure, so let me provide you some. The Ledger ran stories about Palin's unreadiness as VP, the amount spent on her wardrobe for the campaign and the so-called "Troopergate" episode.
The Ledger did not run any stories questioning Biden's readiness (i.e. his > suggestion in the wake of 9/11 that we should write Iran a check for $200 million), his connections with the credit card issuer MBNA (an MBNA executive bought Biden's house, etc.) or how many $1,000+ suits Biden had bought for him by the DNC or Obama-Biden.
The Ledger failed to run a single story on how the Obama campaign disabled basic credit card security software that allowed donations from multiple names using the same credit card number (Osama bin Laden and Adolph Hitler being a couple of names that got through), that did not check for overseas donations > or in any way come into compliance with FEC rules. Where were the Ledger stories following Stanley Kurtz lead on the connections between Obama and William Ayers or Obama and Tony Rezko?
Of course we did see stories about McCain and the Keating 5 and the many "lobbyists" working in McCain's campaign. I could go on and on but the fact is the Ledger's coverage mirrored that of many other media outlets in its tilt toward Obama.
There has always been a liberal bias in the press, but at the end of the day the press has followed stories where they lead no matter who was involved (witness Gary Hart and Donna Rice, Bill Clinton and the many scandals of his administration).
The 2008 campaign will be remembered as the time when liberal media bias transformed into liberal media advocacy, summed up recently by Chris Mathews who said his job as a journalist is to make Barack Obama successful.
This is why readership, advertising and subscriptions will continue to decline as long as the Ledger is seen less and less an honest broker of the news with a left leaning editorial bent and instead as a Pravda-like propaganda arm of the Obama campaign from the news and editorial pages. I hope you might take some of this criticism into account as you seek to cover the Obama inauguration and his administration.
Here are the results of my research regarding the points you raised (from Josh McKoon’s letter). I physically searched the papers of the last nine weeks or so. I didn’t have access to August’s papers. (even numbered issues only)
2. Placement and length of Palin "Troopergate" episode
Sept. 27: “Palin aides defy subpoenas in Troopergate” A10, 5 in.
Oct. 12 “Report stings Palin over Troopergate” A12, 21 in.
Nov. 4 (Election Day) “Report clears Palin in Troopergate probe” Page A6, 18 in.
Sept. 27: “Veep choices add their voices” A10, 48 in.
6. How the Obama campaign disabled basic credit card security software that allowed donations from multiple names using the same credit card number (Osama bin Laden and Adolph Hitler being a couple of names that got through), that did not check for overseas donations or in any way come into compliance with FEC rules.
8. Stories on Obama and Tony Rezko.
10. Stories on the "lobbyists" working in McCain's campaign.
Hope this helps,
Christopher Sheets
Newsroom Training Editor
Date: Nov. 18, 2008
3) Final Version of McKoon Op-Ed From: Joshua McKoon Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 Dear Editor: I read with great interest the editorial in the Friday edition of the Ledger-Enquirer. The Friday editorial admonished voters to watch Republicans for signs of being uncooperative with Obama and the Democratic majorities in Congress. I don't remember any such editorial asking Tom Daschle or Nancy Pelosi to play nice with President Bush when he was elected, twice. It seems counterintuitive to suggest that the party to watch now is the GOP when Democrats control the Legislative and Executive Branches of government. How about cautioning overreach by those in control? Remember 1993 when after running on economic policy President Clinton swung into action by having legislation introduced to...allow gays in the military?! I wanted to address the issue of fairness in terms of the news coverage toward the two presidential tickets. The Ledger-Enquirer is the newspaper of record in our community. I know when I research events and am looking for factual information, I go to archives of the Ledger. I also look to cite the Ledger in debates again for a factual source on which we all can agree. Unfortunately, the Ledger and other mainstream media organs are losing this reputation of being an objective source of information.
The news items carried by the Ledger, principally coming from the Associated Press, have appeared to me to be stacked in favor of the Obama campaign. You want some examples I am sure, so let me provide you with a few.
The Ledger ran stories about Palin's alleged unreadiness as VP, the amount spent on her wardrobe for the campaign and the so-called "Troopergate" episode. The Ledger did not run any stories questioning Biden's readiness (i.e. his suggestion in the wake of 9/11 that we should write Iran a check for $200 million), his connections with the credit card issuer MBNA (an MBNA executive bought Biden's house, etc.) or how many $1,000+ suits Biden had bought for him by the DNC or Obama-Biden.
The Ledger failed to run a single story on how the Obama campaign disabled basic credit card security software that allowed donations from multiple names using the same credit card number (Osama bin Laden and Adolf Hitler being a couple of names that got through), that did not check for overseas donations or in any way come into compliance with FEC rules.
Where were the Ledger stories following Stanley Kurtz lead on the connections between Obama and William Ayers or Obama and Tony Rezko? Of course we did see stories about McCain and the Keating 5 and the many "lobbyists" working in McCain's campaign. I could go on but the fact is the Ledger's coverage mirrored that of many other media outlets relying on wire services in its tilt toward Obama.
There has always been a liberal bias in the press, but at the end of the day the press has followed stories where they led no matter who was involved (witness Gary Hart and Donna Rice, Bill Clinton and the many scandals of his administration).
The 2008 campaign will be remembered as the time when liberal media bias transformed into liberal media advocacy, summed up recently by Chris Mathews who said his job as a journalist is to make Barack Obama successful.
I hope you might take some of this criticism into account as you seek to cover the Obama inauguration and his administration. While I have this platform, I do want to make one other thing clear.
While I opposed the election of the Obama-Biden ticket with all the effort I could muster, we must all now respect the decision the American people have made.
In the wake of this election, evidently there are people making statements that Obama is the anti-Christ or Obama is a radical Muslim "Manchurian Candidate" of some kind. These statements are not only patently false and hateful but also do immeasurable damage to those of us who are trying to articulate a reasoned opposition to the policies we expect will be proposed in the next administration.
We need to stand together in condemning those irresponsible statements and focus on moving our country forward. As for me, Barack Obama is my President and I will support him when I can and respectfully disagree when I cannot. Thank you for the chance to say that. Regards, Josh McKoon, Chairman, Muscogee County Republican Party
Thursday, October 9, 2008
Newspapering in Troubled Times. . .
-----Original Message-----
From: Holden, Ben - Columbus
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2008 12:58 PM
To: 'Ken Clark'
Cc: Canepa, Valerie - Columbus
Subject: Newspapering
Ken:
Ironic, huh? I have a standing rule against putting the D-Word (as in Depression) in a headline, but sometimes the news just seems to justify a full-throated scream. I'll take a look at it and see if we need to dial it back. Thanks for the note. Best, Ben
-v-
Ben Holden
Executive Editor
Ledger-Enquirer
(706) 571-8560 - Phone
(706) 576-6290 - Fax
www.ledger-enquirer.com
bholden@ledger-enquirer.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Ken Clark [mailto:kenclark75@pstel.net]
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2008 6:07 PM
To: Holden, Ben - Columbus
Cc: Canepa, Valerie - Columbus
Subject: Newspapering
Ben, a couple of days ago you wrote an excellent column pointing out that now is the time to remain cool and not panic where the economy is concerned. Did you forget to show it to your headline writers?
Would still like to have that lunch at some point.
Ken Clark
From: Holden, Ben - Columbus
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2008 12:58 PM
To: 'Ken Clark'
Cc: Canepa, Valerie - Columbus
Subject: Newspapering
Ken:
Ironic, huh? I have a standing rule against putting the D-Word (as in Depression) in a headline, but sometimes the news just seems to justify a full-throated scream. I'll take a look at it and see if we need to dial it back. Thanks for the note. Best, Ben
-v-
Ben Holden
Executive Editor
Ledger-Enquirer
(706) 571-8560 - Phone
(706) 576-6290 - Fax
www.ledger-enquirer.com
bholden@ledger-enquirer.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Ken Clark [mailto:kenclark75@pstel.net]
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2008 6:07 PM
To: Holden, Ben - Columbus
Cc: Canepa, Valerie - Columbus
Subject: Newspapering
Ben, a couple of days ago you wrote an excellent column pointing out that now is the time to remain cool and not panic where the economy is concerned. Did you forget to show it to your headline writers?
Would still like to have that lunch at some point.
Ken Clark
Tuesday, October 7, 2008
There You Go Again
Mr. and Ms. Backman:
Thank you for your note. We get this complaint fairly routinely -- balanced of course, by complaints from many in our community who believe we go overboard with race-based reporting and in fact place the faces of minority criminal defendants in prominent display for improper reasons. As the editor, of course, my job is to defend against not just bias or "political correctness" but also the perception of both.
That said, because this issue seems to be of great importance to you, I assume you merely missed the following recent examples of our cops reporting doing exactly what you claim we don't do:
1. Today's paper, Page A6: "The suspect is described as a black man, age 20-30, standing 6-foot-2 and weighing 220 pounds.
2. Yesterday's paper, Page A4: "The suspect is described as a black man, standing 6-foot-2, weighing 190 pounds and wearing a a black, sleveless T-shirt, black pants and a black ski mask."
3. Thursday Oct. 2, Page A5: "The suspect is described as a 5-foot-7 inch to 5-foot 9-inch black man in his 20s."
Our policy is to include descriptions of race as part of descriptions that may help police catch criminals and protect citizens. When we have a description we print it. Our standard is two visible characteristics plus race, or one really unique and visible one plus race. "The suspect was white" is not a description in my view. You may disagree, which is OK by me.
Now if you'll excuse me, I've gotta get back to the mailroom.
Ben
-v-
Ben Holden
Vice President & Executive Editor
Ledger-Enquirer
(706) 571-8560 - Phone
(706) 576-6290 - Fax
www.ledger-enquirer.com
bholden@ledger-enquirer.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Vada [mailto:vbackman@mchsi.com]
Sent: Monday, October 06, 2008 11:43 PM
To: Canepa, Valerie - Columbus; Riquelmy, Alan - Columbus; Holden, Ben - Columbus
Subject: There you go again...
You guys really need to be taken to the woodshed on this one. Did any of you attend Journalism
School or did you work your way up from the mailroom? When identifying a suspect in a crime, RACE is integral to a description of the suspect. It is not racist to identify the race of a suspect. Race is a FACT. Racial identification could prevent an innocent person from being falsely arrested. If dark clothing and dark sunglasses are important...so is dark skin...or light skin. Honestly, I have seen this so many times before in your paper...I am not letting it go this time. If I saw someone with silver teeth and contacted the police, I would feel horrible if I incorrectly fingered a suspect of the wrong color. In the words of Sgt. Joe Friday..."Just the facts, Ma'am." Stop letting YOUR racial sensitivities interfere with reporting the news.
Vada and George Backman
-v-
HERE'S THE STORY:
A late night run to the border Sunday turned into an armed robbery at a Taco Bell.
The robbery happened when a man pulled into the drive-thru at 2:18 a.m. in a small, dark car with blue neon lighting inside, said Columbus Police Sgt. Frank Massa. The driver ordered some food from the 3527 Macon Road restaurant and then pulled up to the window.
"When he got to the window to pay for it, and the guy opened the register, that's when he robbed him," Massa said.
The suspect is described as a man in his 20s, wearing dark clothes, dark sunglasses and having silver teeth (Ed note: Red highlight emphasis was added by emailer). He had some type of handgun, Massa said.
"No injuries reported, and no shots fired," the sergeant added.
Alan Riquelmy
Thank you for your note. We get this complaint fairly routinely -- balanced of course, by complaints from many in our community who believe we go overboard with race-based reporting and in fact place the faces of minority criminal defendants in prominent display for improper reasons. As the editor, of course, my job is to defend against not just bias or "political correctness" but also the perception of both.
That said, because this issue seems to be of great importance to you, I assume you merely missed the following recent examples of our cops reporting doing exactly what you claim we don't do:
1. Today's paper, Page A6: "The suspect is described as a black man, age 20-30, standing 6-foot-2 and weighing 220 pounds.
2. Yesterday's paper, Page A4: "The suspect is described as a black man, standing 6-foot-2, weighing 190 pounds and wearing a a black, sleveless T-shirt, black pants and a black ski mask."
3. Thursday Oct. 2, Page A5: "The suspect is described as a 5-foot-7 inch to 5-foot 9-inch black man in his 20s."
Our policy is to include descriptions of race as part of descriptions that may help police catch criminals and protect citizens. When we have a description we print it. Our standard is two visible characteristics plus race, or one really unique and visible one plus race. "The suspect was white" is not a description in my view. You may disagree, which is OK by me.
Now if you'll excuse me, I've gotta get back to the mailroom.
Ben
-v-
Ben Holden
Vice President & Executive Editor
Ledger-Enquirer
(706) 571-8560 - Phone
(706) 576-6290 - Fax
www.ledger-enquirer.com
bholden@ledger-enquirer.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Vada [mailto:vbackman@mchsi.com]
Sent: Monday, October 06, 2008 11:43 PM
To: Canepa, Valerie - Columbus; Riquelmy, Alan - Columbus; Holden, Ben - Columbus
Subject: There you go again...
You guys really need to be taken to the woodshed on this one. Did any of you attend Journalism
School or did you work your way up from the mailroom? When identifying a suspect in a crime, RACE is integral to a description of the suspect. It is not racist to identify the race of a suspect. Race is a FACT. Racial identification could prevent an innocent person from being falsely arrested. If dark clothing and dark sunglasses are important...so is dark skin...or light skin. Honestly, I have seen this so many times before in your paper...I am not letting it go this time. If I saw someone with silver teeth and contacted the police, I would feel horrible if I incorrectly fingered a suspect of the wrong color. In the words of Sgt. Joe Friday..."Just the facts, Ma'am." Stop letting YOUR racial sensitivities interfere with reporting the news.
Vada and George Backman
-v-
HERE'S THE STORY:
A late night run to the border Sunday turned into an armed robbery at a Taco Bell.
The robbery happened when a man pulled into the drive-thru at 2:18 a.m. in a small, dark car with blue neon lighting inside, said Columbus Police Sgt. Frank Massa. The driver ordered some food from the 3527 Macon Road restaurant and then pulled up to the window.
"When he got to the window to pay for it, and the guy opened the register, that's when he robbed him," Massa said.
The suspect is described as a man in his 20s, wearing dark clothes, dark sunglasses and having silver teeth (Ed note: Red highlight emphasis was added by emailer). He had some type of handgun, Massa said.
"No injuries reported, and no shots fired," the sergeant added.
Alan Riquelmy
Wednesday, July 30, 2008
Reader Loves the Ledger
This note brightened my day and I wanted to share it with you.
Best, Ben
-v-
Ben Holden
Vice President & Executive Editor
Ledger-Enquirer
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Sarah Briggs [mailto:sarah1960@ohio.usa.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 11:22 AM
To: CLE - Soundoff
Cc: vcanepca@ledg-ernquirer.com; Holden, Ben - Columbus; Nix, Dusty - Columbus; Owen, Mike - Columbus
Subject: The L-E
I've lived in cities like Dayton, Jacksonville, Orlando, Sioux City, Little Rock and even Dallas
and none of the newspapers in those cities could match the Ledger-Enquirer.
I feel very grateful to have such a high calibre periodical to inform and entertain me each
morning. Count your blessings.
Sarah
If there are two many cities in my Sound Off take some out.
Note: I love the columnists like Brad Barnes and Larry Gierer and Dusty Nix' editorials
are among the best I have read. I also love Sound Off, the editorial page, Jumble
and the crossword puzzle that is the best I have seen. The only thing I strongly
dislike is the TV section on Sunday. Just very small townish. Embarrassing.
I won't allow out of town visitors to see it laying out. Surely you can improve it.
Best, Ben
-v-
Ben Holden
Vice President & Executive Editor
Ledger-Enquirer
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Sarah Briggs [mailto:sarah1960@ohio.usa.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 11:22 AM
To: CLE - Soundoff
Cc: vcanepca@ledg-ernquirer.com; Holden, Ben - Columbus; Nix, Dusty - Columbus; Owen, Mike - Columbus
Subject: The L-E
I've lived in cities like Dayton, Jacksonville, Orlando, Sioux City, Little Rock and even Dallas
and none of the newspapers in those cities could match the Ledger-Enquirer.
I feel very grateful to have such a high calibre periodical to inform and entertain me each
morning. Count your blessings.
Sarah
If there are two many cities in my Sound Off take some out.
Note: I love the columnists like Brad Barnes and Larry Gierer and Dusty Nix' editorials
are among the best I have read. I also love Sound Off, the editorial page, Jumble
and the crossword puzzle that is the best I have seen. The only thing I strongly
dislike is the TV section on Sunday. Just very small townish. Embarrassing.
I won't allow out of town visitors to see it laying out. Surely you can improve it.
Tuesday, July 15, 2008
The real celebrities
When a celebrity is ill, they get lots of attention, but the real
celebrities are the strength of our community. Here's a note from
Gabriele Azhar about her mother, Charlotte Osterburg.
Dear Mr. Holden:
My mother, Charlotte Osterburg, lived in Columbus from 1957 until we
relocated to Florida in October 2006. Mother was very active in the
community and frequently graced the pages of your paper. She retired as
the Programs Officer of the International Training Detachment at Fort
Benning which involved going into the community to interest people in
sponsoring the foreign officers attending various courses, a job she
loved and excelled at. Mother was the first woman Kiwanian in town and
headed the International Relations Committee. She was a Page One judge
in foreign languages as well as participating in many foreign language
events at Columbus State University. During his tenure, Gov. George
Busbee made her an honorary lieutenant colonel for her efforts in
fostering good foreign relations in Columbus. Mother was also a
Gracious Lady of Georgia.
Most important to Mother was the love felt for this country. We
immigrated from Germany in 1957, and there was no prouder American than
Mother.
If you would like to have additional information, please contact me.
Thank you for your consideration.
Gabriele (Gaby) Osterburg Azhar
celebrities are the strength of our community. Here's a note from
Gabriele Azhar about her mother, Charlotte Osterburg.
Dear Mr. Holden:
My mother, Charlotte Osterburg, lived in Columbus from 1957 until we
relocated to Florida in October 2006. Mother was very active in the
community and frequently graced the pages of your paper. She retired as
the Programs Officer of the International Training Detachment at Fort
Benning which involved going into the community to interest people in
sponsoring the foreign officers attending various courses, a job she
loved and excelled at. Mother was the first woman Kiwanian in town and
headed the International Relations Committee. She was a Page One judge
in foreign languages as well as participating in many foreign language
events at Columbus State University. During his tenure, Gov. George
Busbee made her an honorary lieutenant colonel for her efforts in
fostering good foreign relations in Columbus. Mother was also a
Gracious Lady of Georgia.
Most important to Mother was the love felt for this country. We
immigrated from Germany in 1957, and there was no prouder American than
Mother.
If you would like to have additional information, please contact me.
Thank you for your consideration.
Gabriele (Gaby) Osterburg Azhar
Monday, July 7, 2008
To our Readers:
As you know, journalists nationwide are in the midst of a struggle to re-make the newspaper business in the wake of profound change. Here are the thoughts of Howard Weaver, Vice President for News at our parent company, The McClatchy Co.
Howard Weaver's Blog
Howard Weaver's Blog
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
